第四題What is the result of the “new form of discrimination”(Line 5, Para.4)?
題解: 這是類(lèi)似于閱讀理解中詞義判斷的題,但與做閱讀理解不同的是,在閱讀理解中存在兩種詞匯題,其一是考查學(xué)生利用上下文猜單詞的能力,其二是考查根據(jù)上下文對(duì)(主要是熟悉的)詞語(yǔ)的理解能力。而在簡(jiǎn)答題中,考查的對(duì)象主要是第二點(diǎn)。
就本題而言,原文中已經(jīng)在括號(hào)中給出了不認(rèn)識(shí)的單詞的漢語(yǔ)意思,因此,這是不猜測(cè)詞義的題,而是要求根據(jù)上下文判斷這外短語(yǔ)在本文中的所指,是一道理解的題。
在找到第四段中的這個(gè)短語(yǔ)后,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)在“a new form of discrimination”的破折號(hào)之后的部分內(nèi)容就是答案。稍微組織一下,可以全面的回答為 it singled out the unqualified and liberated the linguistically oppressed。
如果確實(shí)理解了這句話,可以看出它的意思是“它剔除了不合格的(教師),解放了以前在語(yǔ)言上受壓迫的(教師)”。
要點(diǎn): 問(wèn)題是“……的結(jié)果”,應(yīng)該用完整的句子作答。
其它的評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn):
l 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)答案:
The linguistically oppressed are liberated.
Unqualified English teachers are singled out.
l 可得2分的回答:
1) The result is that the linguistically oppressed were liberated.
2) Singling out the unqualified, liberating the linguistically oppressed.
3) The unqualified teachers are singled out while the qualified liberated.
4) It liberated the non-native English teachers linguistically oppressed.
5) It selected the qualified teachers and singled out the unqualified.
l 可得1.5分的回答:
1) The inqualified English teachers are singled out. 語(yǔ)言錯(cuò)誤,扣0.5分。
2) It single out the unqualified liberated ^ linguistically oppressed. 多處語(yǔ)言錯(cuò)誤,扣0..5分。
3) To liberate the linguistically oppressed 不定式表將來(lái),問(wèn)題問(wèn)的是已產(chǎn)生的后果,時(shí)間不符,扣0.5分。
l 可得1分的回答:
1) Qualification may be more important. 句子意義與短文內(nèi)容不貼切,扣1分。
2) The non-native teachers replace those unqualified native teachers.
回答不準(zhǔn)確,什么樣的非本族語(yǔ)教師沒(méi)有說(shuō)清楚,這恰恰是答案的重要部分,扣1分。
3) The unqualified native English teachers will be fired.
句子時(shí)態(tài)錯(cuò)誤,扣0.5分。句子含義不準(zhǔn)確,扣0.5分。
l 可得0.5分的回答:
The non-natives could also become an English teacher.
與短文意義相差太遠(yuǎn),扣1.5分。
l 得0分的回答:
1) Teachers are justified if they were qualified.
2) It will improve the teachers’ all kinds of level.
3) The non-native speaks are liberate.
完全答非所問(wèn),不得分。